![Acunetix vs Qualys: Which is the best choice for you? [2026] Acunetix vs Qualys: Which is the best choice for you? [2026]](https://beaglesecurity.com/blog/images/blog-banner-six-840.webp)
If you’re evaluating Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools in 2025, you’ll inevitably encounter Acunetix and Qualys Web Application Scanning (WAS). Both platforms offer automated vulnerability detection, but they are built for different needs, target distinct markets, and come with contrasting architectural philosophies.
While Acunetix focuses on providing deep-dive web application scanning, Qualys WAS is part of a much broader cloud platform designed for unified IT security and compliance management. Choosing between them depends entirely on whether you prioritize a specialized scanner or a suite-based solution.
This guide pits Acunetix against Qualys WAS, highlights their core strengths and weaknesses, and introduces a modern alternative built for DevSecOps agility: Beagle Security.
| Feature | Acunetix | Qualys WAS |
|---|---|---|
| Target market | Mid-market, specialized DAST | Enterprises, compliance-heavy IT security |
| Scanning technology | DAST with IAST integration (AcuSensor) | DAST, part of a vulnerability management suite |
| Ease of use | Moderate learning curve | Complex UI & workflows |
| AI features | Limited | None |
| API security | Limited (REST, Swagger/Postman) | REST/SOAP |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Pricing starts at | ~$7,000/year (per FQDN) | Custom quote (per-target licensing) |
| G2 rating | 4.1/5 | 4.5/5 |
Both Acunetix and Qualys WAS are strong legacy options, but they often struggle with the pace and complexity of modern DevSecOps, especially when dealing with complex login flows (like 2FA), GraphQL APIs, and fragmented pricing models.
Beagle Security is a next-generation DAST platform built to eliminate the overhead of traditional scanners. It is an AI-powered automated penetration testing tool that mimics real-world attacker behavior to find business-logic and context-specific flaws that are often missed by signature-based tools. With predictable, concurrent test-based pricing, it is a flexible and cost-effective alternative.
AI-enabled automation: Features AI-based login handling and business logic detection, which both Acunetix and Qualys lack.
Flexible pricing: Uses a concurrent test-based model instead of the restrictive, escalating per-FQDN (Acunetix) or per-target (Qualys) licensing.
Developer-first reports: Provides contextual remediation guidance tailored to the user’s tech stack, which is more actionable than the basic reporting offered by Qualys.
Modern support: Offers full GraphQL support and out-of-the-box testing for 2FA-enabled applications and complex SPAs.
| Feature | Acunetix | Qualys WAS | Beagle Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAST | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API security | Limited REST | REST/SOAP | REST + GraphQL (Full Support) |
| Business logic testing | No | No | Yes |
| AI-based login handling | No | No | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | Basic | Limited | Seamless |
| Reporting | Available (PCI, HIPAA) | Basic | Contextual & dev-first |
| 2FA-enabled app support | No | No | Yes |
| False positive filtering | Manual effort | Manual effort | AI-assisted |
Acunetix is positioned as a comprehensive DAST solution known for its effective scanning of traditional web applications.
IAST integration: Offers AcuSensor IAST integration for deeper insight into source code execution during DAST scans, combining black-box and white-box methods.
Compliance ready: Provides HIPAA and PCI DSS compliance-focused reporting.
Coverage: Excellent detection of common flaws, including the OWASP Top 10.
Acunetix weaknesses & limitations:
Rigid licensing: The per-FQDN pricing model can become restrictive and expensive for organizations with many applications or dynamic environments (like Dev/Staging/Prod).
Limited modern support: Struggles with intelligent crawling for complex, modern web technologies like SPAs and GraphQL.
Authentication challenges: Multi-step or token-based authentication often requires extensive manual configuration.
Qualys Web Application Scanning is a module within the larger Qualys Cloud Platform, making it a natural fit for organizations already using Qualys for vulnerability management.
Integrated platform: Seamless integration with other Qualys modules for asset discovery and vulnerability management across IT assets.
Compliance focus: Strong dashboard and policy compliance coverage, highly suitable for environments with heavy regulatory requirements.
Broad scanning: Capable DAST engine with scan scheduling and a unified dashboard for alerts.
Qualys WAS weaknesses & limitations:
Complex User Interface (UI): Users frequently report that the interface is outdated and unintuitive, leading to a steep learning curve.
No AI or business logic: Lacks AI-driven features for advanced logic detection or automated login handling.
Limited DevSecOps: Offers only limited CI/CD integration and requires manual tuning and configuration to avoid false positives.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acunetix | Per-FQDN licensing | ~$7,000/year (per FQDN)* | No |
| Qualys WAS | Per-target licensing | Custom quote (per-target pricing) | Yes |
| Beagle Security | Concurrent test-based | $1,188/year | 14-day free trial |
*Acunetix pricing according to AWS Marketplace
| Choose Acunetix if: | Choose Qualys WAS if: | Choose Beagle Security if: |
|---|---|---|
| You are a mid-sized company prioritizing a dedicated DAST scanner. | You are an enterprise already using the Qualys Cloud Platform. | You need full-spectrum, AI-powered DAST and API testing. |
| You need HIPAA and PCI DSS compliance reporting. | Your primary focus is unified compliance and IT asset management. | You want predictable, scalable pricing with no FQDN lock-ins. |
| You are okay with configuring complex authentication flows manually. | You have the expertise and time to manage manual configurations and a complex UI. | You value actionable, stack-specific remediation advice and a seamless DevSecOps experience. |
While Acunetix and Qualys serve established security programs well, they carry the baggage of legacy licensing and architecture.
If your priority is building a modern, agile AppSec program that scales with your development team and budget, a next-generation solution like Beagle Security is the smarter investment.