Tenable vs Invicti (formerly Netsparker): Which is the best choice for you? [2025]

By
Febna V M
Reviewed by
Nandagopal S
Published on
30 Jul 2025
10 min read
AppSec

When it comes to securing modern web applications and APIs, many organizations start by evaluating tools like Tenable Web App Scanning (WAS) and Invicti (formerly Netsparker). Both platforms offer Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and both are well-established in the vulnerability management space.

But how do they compare in 2025 when DevSecOps is mainstream, login flows are more complex, APIs are everywhere, and pricing predictability is just as important as technical depth?

In this comparison of Tenable vs Invicti, we’ll break down their strengths and weaknesses, and also explore a more modern, AI-driven alternative that’s could be the solution your looking actually for: Beagle Security.

Tenable vs Invicti at a glance

FeatureTenable WASInvicti
Target marketEnterprises, compliance useMid-market to enterprise
Ease of useModerate to high effortModerate learning curve
AI featuresNoneLimited
Free trialNo7-day trial
Pricing starts at$7,434/year for 5 FQDNs~$37,000/year
Gartner rating4.5/54.4/5

A more modern web & API penetration testing alternative: Beagle Security

Beagle Security is a next-generation DAST platform purpose-built for today’s security teams. With a focus on realistic attack simulation, AI-powered login flow handling, and developer-friendly remediation, Beagle bridges the gap that legacy platforms like Tenable and Invicti often leave wide open.

Unlike tools that rely heavily on manual tuning or signature-based detection, Beagle actively adapts to modern architectures like SPAs, microservices, GraphQL APIs, and logic-heavy workflows. It supports testing for 2FA-enabled apps, automates the crawling and testing of complex authentication paths, and provides remediation suggestions tailored to the application’s tech stack.

Beagle’s pricing model is also fundamentally different — it’s based on concurrent tests, not the number of domains or apps — making it ideal for scaling teams, MSSPs, or environments with multiple stages and apps.

TL;DR – Why choose Beagle Security over Tenable & Invicti?

  • Faster onboarding: Launch your first test in minutes, not days

  • No FQDN or per-app limits: Add unlimited applications under one account

  • AI-powered testing engine: Realistic business logic attacks, AI-driven login handling

  • 2FA support: Test applications protected by modern auth flows

  • Developer-first reporting: Actionable, stack-specific remediation guidance

  • CI/CD integrations: Fits seamlessly into GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and more

Tenable vs Invicti vs Beagle Security: Feature comparison

FeatureTenable WASInvictiBeagle Security
API securityRESTRESTREST + GraphQL
Business logic testingNoNoYes
AI-based login handlingNoNoYes
CI/CD integrationBasicAdvancedNative integrations
ReportingBasic exportsStructuredContext-aware
2FA-enabled app supportNoNoYes
False positive filteringManualLimitedAI-assisted
Tech stack specific fixesNoNoYes

Tenable features

Key Tenable features

  • Basic REST API scanning

  • Centralized asset management via Tenable.io

  • Scan scheduling and reporting

  • Integration with Tenable’s vulnerability platform

  • Basic compliance tracking

  • Supports OWASP Top 10 coverage

Tenable WAS is a component of Tenable.io, primarily known for network and cloud vulnerability management. The web app scanning module offers basic DAST capabilities, integrates with Tenable’s central console, and allows for scheduled scans and vulnerability reporting. It’s typically used by teams that already rely on Tenable for other assets.

However, the platform has several drawbacks when it comes to modern applications. It lacks support for modern authentication schemes like 2FA or token-based login flows. Business logic testing is not included, and reporting is relatively generic without application context. While it’s capable of identifying OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, it often lacks depth in detecting logic or workflow-based flaws.

It also does not provide tech stack-specific remediation guidance, which can slow down developer response times.

Invicti features

Key Invicti features

  • DAST engine with high scalability

  • Enterprise CI/CD and workflow integrations

  • Team-based access controls

  • Rich vulnerability tracking and assignment

  • Limited support for modern API and logic workflows

  • SSO and role-based access management

Invicti is built with automation and coverage in mind. It uses Proof-Based Scanning™ to help validate findings and reduce false positives. With solid CI/CD integrations and support for authenticated scans, it’s well-suited for organizations that want structured automation with some degree of customization.

However, like Tenable, Invicti doesn’t support 2FA-secured apps, lacks context-aware remediation guidance, and has limited capabilities for understanding complex business logic flows. Teams often need to spend time fine-tuning scans, configuring policies, and validating scan results manually.

Beagle Security features

Beagle stands out for offering a modernized DAST engine infused with AI to tackle real-world scenarios. It can intelligently navigate login sequences—including MFA/2FA flows—scan SPAs and dynamic forms, and simulate logical flaws that standard tools overlook.

Its reporting engine generates detailed and contextual feedback tailored to the tech stack being used. This means a Laravel app receives Laravel-specific fix recommendations. The platform also supports REST, GraphQL, and SOAP APIs, making it one of the most comprehensive API DAST tools available.

Key features:

  • AI-powered DAST and business logic testing

  • Contextual remediation guidance based on tech stack

  • Full API security support (REST, GraphQL)

  • Real-world penetration testing simulations

  • Intelligent test case selection and false positive filtering

  • Seamless CI/CD integration and DevSecOps alignment

  • Concurrent test-based pricing for enterprise flexibility

  • Easy onboarding and intuitive UX

Tenable vs Invicti vs Beagle Security: Pricing comparison

PlatformPricing ModelStarting PriceFree Trial
TenablePer-FQDN$7,434/year for 5 FQDNsNo
InvictiPer-FQDN~$37,000/year7-day trial
Beagle SecurityConcurrent test-based$1,428/year14-day free trial

Tenable pricing

Tenable WAS starts at $7,434/year for 5 FQDNs and comes bundled with Tenable’s One platform.

While suitable for existing Tenable customers, its pricing structure can be a hurdle for those who only need application security testing.

Invicti pricing

Invicti pricing starts around $37,000/year for a limited number of FQDNs. As your app count grows or environments change, costs increase accordingly. Custom integrations, team roles, and deeper reporting features may require premium plans.

Beagle Security pricing

Beagle Security is refreshingly transparent. Pricing is based on features and usage, not arbitrary target limits. It offers annual and monthly plans with MSSP-friendly models. Most importantly, you can try it for free before deciding.

Even at lower tiers, you get access to core features including AI automation, business logic testing, and CI/CD integration, making it one of the most cost-effective platforms for proactive security testing.

Tenable vs Invicti vs Beagle Security: Customer reviews comparison

PlatformG2 Rating
Tenable4.5/5
Invicti4.6/5
Beagle Security4.7/5

*Tenable G2 rating is of Tenable One platform. Tenable WAS is included in the Tenable One bundle.

Tenable reviews

Tenable users value the unified platform and asset tracking features, especially for network and cloud workloads. But they often cite that the web application module lacks flexibility, detailed context, and modern testing depth.

Tenable reviews

Source: Gartner Peer Insights

Invicti reviews

Invicti is praised for its scanning reliability and workflow automation, though reviewers highlight pain points like configuration complexity, slow large-scale scans, and lack of advanced logic coverage.

Invicti reviews

Source: G2

Beagle Security reviews

Beagle continues to receive high marks for intuitive UX, powerful AI-based scanning, and fast remediation workflows. Teams appreciate the developer-first reporting, seamless integrations, and responsive support.

If you’re just checking a box, you can go with anything. But if you’re serious about building a cybersecurity culture, not just a security process then Beagle Security is your best bet.
Rohan Puri
Rohan Puri
CDO, Discern Security

Tenable vs Invicti vs Beagle Security: Which is best for you?

Choose Tenable if:

  • You’re already using Tenable.io for other asset types

  • You’re focused on compliance reporting and basic DAST

  • You can manage without deep authentication or logic testing

Choose Invicti if:

  • You want scalable DAST with Proof-Based Scanning™

  • You have time to configure and verify scan results

  • Your apps don’t use complex login flows or 2FA

Choose Beagle Security if:

  • You test modern apps with custom workflows and APIs

  • You want AI-driven, context-aware testing with fewer false positives

  • You need affordable, unlimited app coverage

  • You value speed, automation, and dev-friendly remediation

Try Beagle Security for free to see how it compares

Tenable and Invicti are reliable. But they were built for another era.

If you’re ready for something more intelligent, efficient, and modern, Beagle Security is your best bet.

Test unlimited apps, automate smarter, and remediate faster with a platform that understands your tech stack.

You can start a 14-day free trial or schedule a demo to get started with the Beagle Security platform.


Written by
Febna V M
Febna V M
Cyber Security Engineer
Contributor
Nandagopal S
Nandagopal S
Marketing Associate
Experience the Beagle Security platform
Unlock one full penetration test and all Advanced plan features free for 10 days