Invicti pricing 2025: Is it worth it?

With vulnerabilities becoming more complex and organizations facing increasing attacks, investing in the right application security platform is a critical decision. Invicti, formerly known as Netsparker, is one of the most established names in this space, offering enterprise-grade DAST, proof-based scanning, and a wide range of AppSec capabilities.

However, for CISOs, DevSecOps leaders, and IT decision-makers, the real question is not about brand recognition but about whether Invicti provides enough value for the price.

In this article, we break down Invicti pricing in 2025, the factors influencing cost, and whether it is worth the investment compared to newer, cost-efficient alternatives such as Beagle Security.

How much does Invicti cost?

Invicti pricing is not publicly listed and is available only through quotes. Based on verified sources, here is what the cost typically looks like in 2025:

• Entry-level pricing starts at around $7,000 per year for basic packages according to Azure Marketplace.

• Pricing is shaped by multiple factors, including the number of targets, deployment model, and service add-ons.

Invicti key features

Invicti is designed to deliver proof-based and accurate application security testing at scale. Some of its main capabilities include:

• Proof-based DAST that verifies vulnerabilities automatically, with 99.98% accuracy to minimize false positives.

• API scanning with support for REST, SOAP, gRPC, and GraphQL, backed by proof validation.

• Deep integrations across AppSec modules including SAST, SCA, container security, and application security posture management (ASPM).

• Coverage for modern web apps, APIs, and legacy systems, with scalability across thousands of assets.

• CI/CD pipeline integration, role-based access control, executive dashboards, and remediation workflows for security teams.

These features make Invicti a strong choice for enterprises that require comprehensive AppSec testing, accuracy, and scalability across complex environments.

Best Invicti alternative: Beagle Security

Beagle Security offers a modern, developer-friendly alternative to Invicti with AI-driven penetration testing. Unlike traditional scanners, Beagle Security focuses on delivering actionable results with fewer false positives while integrating seamlessly into CI/CD workflows.

Beagle Security’s platform emphasizes real-world attack simulations, deep API coverage (including GraphQL), and compliance-ready outputs that help security and development teams collaborate more effectively. With its focus on agility and accuracy, it is particularly well-suited for modern DevSecOps teams.

Beagle Security pricing: Plans start at $1,188 per year, which is often 70–90% lower than Invicti for standard use cases.

Beagle Security ratings and reviews: Beagle Security holds a 4.7/5 rating on G2, with users consistently praising its ease of use, accuracy, and strong developer workflows.

Customers highlight the platform’s ability to simulate realistic attack scenarios, provide clear remediation steps, and reduce false positives, making it an attractive option for organizations prioritizing efficiency and affordability.

Quick comparison

Factors influencing Invicti pricing

Several elements heavily affect Invicti’s pricing:

• Number of targets (FQDNs): Pricing scales with the number of assets and domains included in the deployment.

• Edition and deployment model: Invicti offers Standard, Team, and Enterprise editions, with options for on-demand, on-premises, or hybrid deployment.

• Feature add-ons: Modules such as ASPM dashboards, IAST, and premium support increase costs.

• Organization size and negotiation: Larger organizations and longer-term contracts may unlock more favorable pricing tiers.

• Proof-of-concept and trials: Invicti provides short trial periods, but deeper feature testing often requires custom discussions and negotiations.

Is Invicti pricing worth it in 2025?

Invicti is a powerful, enterprise-grade platform designed for organizations with complex security requirements and large application portfolios. Its proof-based DAST and broad integrations make it a strong choice for enterprises that value accuracy and visibility at scale. However, the pricing can quickly become prohibitive for smaller teams or those managing large numbers of FQDNs.

Beagle Security, on the other hand, provides a more agile and cost-effective alternative. With transparent pricing, developer-centric workflows, and strong API and GraphQL coverage, it offers many of the capabilities modern teams need without the enterprise-level cost.

For organizations with extensive and mature AppSec programs, Invicti remains a solid investment. For those seeking faster, more affordable solutions, Beagle Security delivers strong coverage with significant cost savings.

Written by

Manindar Mohan

Cyber Security Lead Engineer

Contributor

Aaron Thomas

Product Marketing Specialist