Product & Solutions
Resources
FREE TOOLS
Website Security Assessment SSL Certificate Checker Domain Expiry Checker HELP AND SUPPORT
Help Center Developer HubCompany
Finding the right tools for your specific AppSec needs is a crucial factor in making your job easy.
In application security this is especially true given how demanding the field has become.
Veracode is probably one of the first names you hear in your search for SAST, DAST or SCA tools. You may have even used it or might be in search of a better alternative.
Let’s find out what the other options are.
Before we take a look at the Veracode alternatives let us understand what Veracode brings to the table. And also, what it doesn’t.
By providing SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing services, Veracode does provide an enticing overall tool to provide a comprehensive view of an organization’s application security posture.
The AppSec space has evolved to understand the importance of combining SAST and DAST, and by providing both they try to obtain customers with a proclivity to their brand.
Veracode’s pricing is not published publicly. Veracode has a tiered pricing structure based on the number of applications and the number of scans performed.
The only way to understand what their services are going to cost you is by scheduling a demo and talking to one of their sales reps. While this is not ideal, it is the only way to go about understanding what it is going to cost you and get started with using Veracode.
Veracode has a rating of 3.6/5 on G2. Here are some of the Veracode reviews from users on G2:
The biggest advantage that Veracode has is being a 15+ year old company, they have been able to offer products across the board for DAST, SAST & SCA fueled by acquisitions as well – as seen in their recent acquisition of Crashtest Security.
While it is tempting for organizations to settle in for one vendor for all their application security needs, it might not always be the best option. More and more companies are evolving in the application security space and there are companies who’ve made their mark in the individual spaces, be it DAST, SAST, or SCA.
Let’s take a look at the best Veracode alternatives of the lot.
Snyk is a Veracode alternative in the SAST space and it helps organizations identify vulnerabilities in their code and improve the security of their applications.
Snyk is a cloud-based software security platform that provides security testing and remediation capabilities for a variety of applications, including web applications, mobile applications, and cloud-based services.
Snyk’s Static Application Security Testing (SAST) capabilities help organizations identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities in their software applications before they are deployed.
Developers can scan their code and receive real-time feedback on any security issues.
The platform provides an intuitive user interface that allows developers to easily understand and fix security vulnerabilities, even if they have limited security knowledge. Snyk’s SAST capabilities are also integrated with a range of development tools, making it easy to incorporate security testing into the software development process.
Snyk provides remediation guidance and integrates with issue tracking systems used by development teams, making it easy to manage security issues and track progress. In addition to SAST, Snyk also offers SCA, container scanning and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) security scanning.
Snyk offers a free subscription plan for you to get started with SAST, SCA, container and IaC scanning.
There is a paid Team subscription plan available that starts at $29/developer per month for SAST alone. If you’d like to include SCA, container and IaC scanning, then the Team plan costs $98/developer per month. A limitation here is that the Team plan requires a minimum of 5 developers, according to the information available on the pricing page.
Snyk also offers a custom Enterprise plan for larger organizations.
Price: Free plan available. Paid plans start at $98/developer per month for Code, Open Source, Container and IaC scans.
Snyk has a rating of 4.6/5 on G2 and 4.8/5 on Capterra. Here are some of the Snyk reviews from users:
GitLab is a web-based platform that provides Git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, continuous integration and deployment, and other features.
Security testing is an important aspect of software development, and GitLab provides several tools to perform security testing. One of these tools is Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and can be considered a good Veracode alternative.
GitLab provides built-in SAST functionality, which can be integrated into the development workflow and run as part of the CI/CD pipeline. This helps to identify security issues early in the development process, allowing developers to address them before the code is deployed.
To use SAST in GitLab, you need to create a pipeline that includes a SAST job, and configure it to scan the source code of your application.
The results of the SAST scan are then displayed in the GitLab interface, where you can view the details of each issue, prioritize, and track the progress of fixing them.
While GitLab does not give us an exact pricing scheme, it does provide us with the details of the features we get as we move up the tiers.
GitLab has a rating of 4.5/5 on G2 and 4.6/5 on Capterra. Here is one of the GitLab reviews from a user:
Beagle Security is a DAST tool that helps in identifying security vulnerabilities in web applications & APIs and is an ideal Veracode alternative as far as DAST is concerned.
Beagle Security gives you benefits such as:
Technology, platform, and framework agnostic vulnerability detection: Allows you to secure your web apps irrespective of what stack your apps are built on.
In-depth penetration testing: Beagle Security provides automated VAPT and can detect advanced attack vectors vulnerability scanners fail to detect. Being backed by an AI-engine, you get unmatched coverage, human-like automation and better results with the least false positives.
Vulnerability remediation guidance: Get in touch with the security experts easily for guidance regarding fixing vulnerabilities.
Hunt down zero-day vulnerabilities: You are backed by a dedicated team of security researchers that is always on the hunt for the latest zero-days and adding them to the vulnerability index.
Shift-left security: Incorporate security testing into the early stages of your development process with CI/CD pipeline integrations to find and fix security issues when it’s most cost-effective.
Compliance: Adhere to compliance standards like PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 and ISO with Beagle Security’s detailed penetration test reports.
Test result in the desired format: The test results can be obtained as a report in PDF, CSV, XML, or JSON format with detailed information for both technical and non-technical people alike.
Beagle Security also provides a comprehensive list of their pricing, based on either monthly or yearly subscriptions. There’s a free plan available to get started and paid plans start at as low as $49/month for the Starter plan.
A Standard plan is available for $99/month and Professional plan at $199/month, the major difference between them being the number of tests available each month. You can also get a customized Enterprise plan.
Price: Free plan available. Paid plans start at $49 per month.
Beagle Security has a rating of 4.7/5 on G2 and 4.9/5 on Capterra. Here are some of the Beagle Security reviews from customers on G2:
OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) is an open-source dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool that helps you identify security vulnerabilities in web applications.
OWASP ZAP provides both automated and manual security testing capabilities making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.
Its automated scanner uses a set of pre-defined attack scripts to test for common vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and broken authentication and authorization.
OWASP ZAP also has a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible for developers of all skill levels, and it can be easily integrated into your development workflow to help you identify and fix security issues as early as possible.
However, one downside is that the setup is not straightforward and there’s a bit of a learning curve to get started with the tool.
Zap is an open source, non-profit tool maintained by OWASP and is therefore free to use.
Price: Free
OWASP ZAP has a rating of 4.7/5 on Capterra. Here is an OWASP ZAP review from a user:
Mend is a cloud-based platform that provides software security testing and remediation capabilities for organizations.
One of its key features is its Software Composition Analysis (SCA) capabilities, which help organizations identify and manage security vulnerabilities and compliance issues in the open-source components used in their software applications.
With Mend’s SCA capabilities, organizations can quickly and easily scan their codebase to identify any security vulnerabilities and receive detailed information on the severity of each issue.
The platform provides remediation guidance and integrates with issue tracking systems used by development teams, making it easy to manage security issues and track progress.
Mend also provides a range of integrations with popular development tools, including GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easy for organizations to incorporate security testing into their software development processes.
In addition to SCA, Mend also offers SAST capabilities.
Mend offers a free subscription plan for certain developer tools.
The paid plans start at $16000 per year for SCA alone. If you’d like to include SAST too, then the paid plan costs $24000 per year.
Mend also offers a Premium package for enterprise organizations.
Price: Free plan available. Paid plans start at $16000 per year for SCA.
Mend has a rating of 4.3/5 on G2 and 4.3/5 on Capterra. Here is a review of Mend from a user:
Contrast Security is a cloud-based security platform that provides software security testing and protection capabilities.
One of its key features is its Software Composition Analysis (SCA) capabilities, which help organizations identify and manage security vulnerabilities and compliance issues in the open-source components used in their software applications. This makes it a good Veracode alternative for your SCA needs.
With Contrast Security’s SCA capabilities, you can quickly and easily scan your codebase to identify any security vulnerabilities and receive detailed information on the severity of each issue.
Contrast Security also provides runtime protection capabilities, which help organizations detect and respond to security threats in real-time, even after an application has been deployed.
These capabilities include runtime application self-protection (RASP), which integrates security into the application itself, and continuous monitoring, which provides real-time visibility into application behavior.
This Veracode alternative does not give us the pricing right away, and requires us to create an account with them in order to know how deep into our pockets we have to go.
Contrast Security has a rating of 4.5/5 on G2. Here is one of the Contrast Security reviews from a user:
Let’s now consider a Veracode alternative that can give you SAST, DAST, and SCA.
Checkmarx is a cloud-based platform that provides a range of application security testing capabilities, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) making it an ideal Veracode alternative.
Checkmarx’s SAST capabilities allow organizations to scan their codebase and identify security vulnerabilities before they are deployed. The platform provides a comprehensive view of security issues, including the severity of each issue, and integrates with issue tracking systems used by development teams, making it easy to manage security issues and track progress.
Checkmarx’s DAST capabilities provide real-time feedback on security issues, helping organizations identify and mitigate security vulnerabilities in their applications.
In addition to its application security testing capabilities, Checkmarx provides SCA capabilities, which help organizations identify and manage security vulnerabilities and compliance issues in the open-source components used in their applications.
The platform integrates with popular development tools, including GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easy for organizations to incorporate security testing into their software development processes.
Checkmarx provides a comprehensive application security testing platform that helps organizations address the security needs of their applications and ensure the security of their software development processes much like Veracode does.
Checkmarx’s pricing is not available on their website. Scheduling a demo and getting in touch with the team is the only way to understand the cost.
Checkmarx has a rating of 4.2/5 on G2. Here are some of the Checkmarx reviews from customers:
Scanning Capabilities: Both Checkmarx and Veracode are capable of performing SAST, DAST and SCA scans.
Integrations: Checkmarx integrates with a wide range of development tools and environments, including DevOps tools like Jenkins and Azure DevOps, making it easy to integrate into existing workflows. Veracode also integrates with a variety of development tools and platforms.
Reporting and Management: Both Checkmarx and Veracode provide robust reporting and management capabilities, allowing organizations to track the progress of their security testing efforts and easily manage the results.
Pricing: The cost of both Checkmarx and Veracode can vary depending on the size of the organization, the number of applications being tested, and the level of support required. Veracode has a reputation for being more expensive compared to Checkmarx.
In conclusion, the choice between any of these alternatives and Veracode will depend on the specific needs of your organization.
All of them have their strengths and weaknesses, and the right choice will depend on factors such as your organization’s size, the types of applications being developed, your AppSec maturity state and the level of integration required with existing workflows.
