The 7 best Veracode alternatives in the market today [2026]

Finding the right tools for your specific AppSec needs is a crucial factor in making your job easier.

In application security, this is especially true given how demanding the field has become. Development cycles are faster, AI-generated code is increasingly common, cloud-native architectures dominate modern stacks, and regulatory pressure continues to intensify. Security teams are expected to deliver deeper coverage with fewer bottlenecks while aligning tightly with DevOps and compliance goals.

Veracode is probably one of the first names you hear in your search for SAST, DAST, or SCA tools. You may have even used it or might be in search of a better alternative.

While Veracode remains a well-known enterprise AppSec vendor, the application security landscape has evolved significantly. Many organizations today are looking for platforms that provide stronger developer alignment, faster feedback cycles, transparent pricing, AI-assisted remediation, deeper API security coverage, or better integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Let’s find out what the other options are.

Veracode

Veracode key overview:

Veracode offers SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing for a comprehensive view of application security.

They combine SAST and DAST to attract customers.

Before we take a look at the Veracode alternatives let us understand what Veracode brings to the table. And also, what it doesn’t.

By providing SAST, SCA, DAST, and penetration testing services, Veracode does provide an enticing overall tool to provide a comprehensive view of an organization’s application security posture.

Veracode has built its reputation around deep binary analysis and enterprise-grade reporting. Its platform supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates with major development ecosystems. For highly regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and government, this breadth of coverage has historically made Veracode a default choice.

The AppSec space has evolved to understand the importance of combining SAST and DAST, and by providing both they try to obtain customers with a proclivity to their brand. The unified approach allows security teams to identify vulnerabilities both at the code level and during runtime simulation.

However, modern development environments introduce additional expectations. Teams now demand faster scan times, fewer false positives, support for cloud-native infrastructure, AI-generated code analysis, and stronger API-first testing. Developer experience has also become a deciding factor, with organizations prioritizing tools that integrate seamlessly into IDEs and CI/CD pipelines without slowing delivery.

While Veracode offers broad coverage, some organizations find that its scanning model, pricing structure, and workflow integration may not always align with fast-moving DevSecOps teams or startups operating at scale.

Understanding both the strengths and limitations of Veracode will help you evaluate whether sticking with it or switching to an alternative makes the most sense for your organization.

Veracode pricing

Veracode’s pricing is not published publicly. The platform follows a tiered pricing structure based on the number of applications, lines of code, and scan frequency.

To understand what their services will cost, you must schedule a demo and speak with a sales representative. While this approach allows for customized enterprise packages, it can slow down decision-making for teams that prefer transparent, self-serve pricing models.

For growing teams and DevSecOps-driven environments, unpredictable pricing tied to application growth can become difficult to forecast.

Veracode pricing overview:

• Pricing is not publicly published.

• It’s tiered based on applications, scans, and usage.

• To get pricing, you must schedule a demo.

Veracode reviews

Veracode has a rating of approximately 3.7/5 on G2. Here are some recurring themes from user feedback:

Users appreciate:

• Deep binary-level scanning

• Strong compliance reporting

• Long-standing enterprise reputation

However, common concerns include:

• Slow scan times

• Higher false positives in some cases

• Pricing complexity

• Friction in modern CI/CD pipelines

Veracode’s biggest advantage remains its maturity and enterprise footprint. With over 15+ years in the industry and multiple acquisitions, including Crashtest Security, it has built a broad AppSec portfolio covering SAST, DAST, and SCA.

That said, many organizations today prefer specialized tools that excel deeply in one category rather than relying on a single consolidated vendor.

Let’s look at the best Veracode alternatives across SAST, DAST, and SCA.

Veracode alternatives for SAST

1. Snyk

Snyk key overview:

• Snyk is a SAST alternative that identifies code vulnerabilities and improves application security.

• It’s a cloud-based platform for security testing and remediation across various applications.

• Snyk’s SAST identifies and mitigates vulnerabilities pre-deployment.

• Developers get real-time feedback and an intuitive UI to fix issues.

• It integrates with development tools and provides remediation guidance.

• Snyk also offers SCA, container, and IaC security scanning.

Snyk is a strong Veracode alternative in the SAST space, particularly for developer-first teams. It helps organizations identify vulnerabilities early and integrate security directly into developer workflows.

Its real-time scanning inside IDEs and CI pipelines makes it attractive for teams practicing shift-left security. DeepCode AI enhances scanning accuracy and suggests automated fixes for common vulnerabilities.

Snyk also provides SCA, container security, and Infrastructure as Code scanning, making it a broader developer security platform rather than a pure SAST tool.

Snyk pricing

Snyk offers a free subscription plan for individual developers and small teams to get started with SAST, SCA, IaC, and container scanning.

The paid Team plan starts at $25/month per contributing developer.

For organizations looking for broader coverage across the SDLC, including up to 10 DAST targets alongside SAST, SCA, IaC, and Container, the Ignite plan starts at $1,260/year per contributing developer.

For unified AppSec at scale, custom-priced Enterprise plans are available

Snyk pricing overview:

• A free subscription plan is available.

• The Team plan starts at $25/month per contributing developer.

• The Ignite plan (covering a wider range of scans including DAST) starts at $1,260/year per contributing developer.

• Custom-priced Enterprise plans are available by contacting sales.

Snyk reviews

Snyk has a rating of 4.5/5 on G2 and 4.6/5 on Capterra.

Users often praise:

• Developer-friendly UI

• Seamless integrations

• Strong open-source dependency visibility

2. Aikido Security

Aikido key overview:

• Aikido Security is a SAST alternative that helps organizations identify vulnerabilities in code and improve application security.

• It’s a cloud-based platform that provides security testing across various applications, including web, mobile, and cloud services.

• Aikido’s SAST capabilities allow developers to detect and remediate vulnerabilities before deployment, reducing the risk of security incidents.

• Developers receive real-time feedback and actionable guidance via an intuitive interface, making it easy to fix issues even without deep security expertise.

• It integrates seamlessly with popular development tools, CI/CD pipelines, and issue-tracking systems, allowing security testing to be part of the development workflow.

• Beyond SAST, Aikido also offers DAST, SCA, secrets detection, and Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) scanning, providing comprehensive coverage for modern applications.

Aikido Security is a strong Veracode alternative in the SAST space, enabling organizations to proactively secure their applications and manage vulnerabilities efficiently.

Aikido pricing

Aikido offers flexible subscription plans for teams of all sizes:

• Free plan: For individual developers or small projects, covering basic SAST scans.

• Team plan: Includes advanced SAST and integration features, starting at $30/developer per month, with minimum developer requirements.

• Enterprise plan: For larger organizations with full coverage of SAST, DAST, SCA, and IaC scanning, plus dedicated support and custom SLAs.

Aikido’s pricing and plans are designed to scale with your team while ensuring comprehensive security coverage across all stages of development.

Aikido Security reviews

Aikido Security has a rating of 4.6/5 on G2. Here are some recurring themes from user feedback:

Users appreciate:

• Ease of use and seamless integrations

• Actionable, low-noise findings and automated triage

• Strong value, particularly in the free tier

However, common concerns include:

• Steep pricing structure for smaller businesses moving to paid tiers

• Lacking some advanced customization and reporting features for complex enterprises

Veracode alternatives for DAST

1. Beagle Security

Beagle Security key overview:

• Beagle Security is a DAST tool for web applications, APIs, and GraphQLs, serving as a Veracode alternative.

• It offers technology-agnostic vulnerability detection and in-depth penetration testing.

• An AI-engine provides coverage, human-like automation, and fewer false positives.

• It provides remediation guidance, hunts zero-day vulnerabilities, and supports shift-left security with CI/CD integrations.

• Beagle Security helps adhere to compliance standards and provides detailed reports in various formats.

Beagle Security is a DAST tool that helps in identifying security vulnerabilities in web applications, APIs, and GraphQLs, and is an ideal Veracode alternative as far as DAST is concerned.

Beagle Security gives you benefits such as:

• Technology, platform, and framework agnostic vulnerability detection: Allows you to secure your web apps irrespective of what stack your apps are built on.

• In-depth penetration testing: Beagle Security provides automated VAPT and can detect advanced attack vectors vulnerability scanners fail to detect. Being backed by an AI-engine, you get unmatched coverage, human-like automation and better results with the least false positives.

• Vulnerability remediation guidance: Get in touch with the security experts easily for guidance regarding fixing vulnerabilities.

• Hunt down zero-day vulnerabilities: You are backed by a dedicated team of security researchers that is always on the hunt for the latest zero-days and adding them to the vulnerability index.

• Shift-left security: Incorporate security testing into the early stages of your development process with CI/CD pipeline integrations to find and fix security issues when it’s most cost-effective.

• Compliance: Adhere to compliance standards like PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2 and ISO with Beagle Security’s detailed penetration test reports.

• Test result in the desired format: The test results can be obtained as a report in PDF, CSV, XML, or JSON format with detailed information for both technical and non-technical people alike.

Beagle Security pricing

Beagle Security also provides a comprehensive list of their pricing, based on either monthly or yearly subscriptions. There’s a free plan available to get started and paid plans start at as low as $119/month for the Essential plan.

The Advanced plan is available for $359. You can also get a customized Enterprise plan.

Beagle Security pricing overview:

• A comprehensive pricing list is available.

• A free plan is available, with paid plans starting at $119/month.

• Advanced and customized Enterprise plans are also offered.

Beagle security reviews

Beagle Security has a rating of 4.7/5 on G2 and 4.9/5 on Capterra. Here are some of the Beagle Security reviews from customers on G2:

2. ZAP by Checkmarx

ZAP by Checkmarx key overview:

• ZAP is an open-source DAST tool for identifying web application vulnerabilities.

• It offers automated and manual security testing, accessible to all skill levels.

• The automated scanner tests for common vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection.

• It has a user-friendly interface and integrates with development workflows.

• A downside is a learning curve for setup.

ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy) by Checkmarx is an open-source dynamic application security testing (DAST) tool that helps you identify security vulnerabilities in web applications.

ZAP provides both automated and manual security testing capabilities, making it accessible for developers of all skill levels.

Its automated scanner uses a set of pre-defined attack scripts to test for common vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, and broken authentication and authorization.

ZAP also has a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible for developers of all skill levels, and it can be easily integrated into your development workflow to help you identify and fix security issues as early as possible.

However, one downside is that the setup is not straightforward, and there’s a bit of a learning curve to get started with the tool.

ZAP pricing

Zap is an open-source, non-profit tool maintained by Checkmarx and is therefore free to use.

ZAP reviews

ZAP has a rating of 5/5 on Capterra. Here is an OWASP ZAP review from a user:

Veracode alternatives for SCA

1. Mend

Mend key overview:

• Mend is a cloud-based platform for software security testing and remediation.

• Its key SCA feature identifies and manages vulnerabilities in open-source components.

• It provides remediation guidance and integrates with issue tracking systems and popular development tools.

• Mend also offers SAST capabilities.

Mend is a cloud-based platform that provides software security testing and remediation capabilities for organizations.

One of its key features is its Software Composition Analysis (SCA) capabilities, which help organizations identify and manage security vulnerabilities and compliance issues in the open-source components used in their software applications.

With Mend’s SCA capabilities, organizations can quickly and easily scan their codebase to identify any security vulnerabilities and receive detailed information on the severity of each issue.

The platform provides remediation guidance and integrates with issue tracking systems used by development teams, making it easy to manage security issues and track progress.

Mend also provides a range of integrations with popular development tools, including GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, making it easy for organizations to incorporate security testing into their software development processes.

In addition to SCA, Mend also offers SAST capabilities.

Mend pricing

The paid plans start at $1000 per developer per year.

Mend also offers a Premium package for access to their advanced AI capabilities. Pricing for this is unavailable.

Mend pricing overview:

• Paid plans start at $1000 per developer per year.

• A Premium package for advanced AI capabilities is available, but pricing is not disclosed.

Mend reviews

Mend has a rating of 4.3/5 on G2. Here is a review of Mend from a user:

2. Contrast Security

Contrast Security key overview:

• Contrast Security is a cloud-based platform for software security testing and protection.

• Its SCA capabilities identify and manage vulnerabilities in open-source components, making it a good Veracode alternative.

• It also provides runtime protection (RASP) and continuous monitoring.

Contrast Security is a cloud-based security platform that provides software security testing and protection capabilities.

One of its key features is its Software Composition Analysis (SCA) capabilities, which help organizations identify and manage security vulnerabilities and compliance issues in the open-source components used in their software applications. This makes it a good Veracode alternative for your SCA needs.

With Contrast Security’s SCA capabilities, you can quickly and easily scan your codebase to identify any security vulnerabilities and receive detailed information on the severity of each issue.

Contrast Security also provides runtime protection capabilities, which help organizations detect and respond to security threats in real-time, even after an application has been deployed.

These capabilities include runtime application self-protection (RASP), which integrates security into the application itself, and continuous monitoring, which provides real-time visibility into application behavior.

Contrast Security pricing

This Veracode alternative does not provide its pricing publicly.

Contrast Security reviews

Contrast Security has a rating of 4.5/5 on G2. Here is one of the Contrast Security reviews from a user:

Let’s now consider a Veracode alternative that can give you SAST, DAST, and SCA.

Checkmarx

Checkmarx key overview:

• Cloud-based platform offering SAST, DAST, and SCA.

• Provides deep source code analysis.

• DAST delivers runtime feedback.

• SCA manages open-source risks.

• Integrates with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab.

Checkmarx is a cloud-based platform that provides a range of application security testing capabilities, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) making it an ideal Veracode alternative.

Its SAST capabilities allow teams to scan source code and identify vulnerabilities early in the development process. Findings include severity classification and remediation guidance, helping teams prioritize fixes effectively.

Checkmarx’s DAST capabilities test running applications, identifying issues that may not appear in static analysis alone. This includes authentication flaws, configuration weaknesses, and runtime vulnerabilities.

In addition to SAST and DAST, Checkmarx includes Software Composition Analysis (SCA), which enables organizations to track and manage vulnerabilities in open-source libraries and third-party components.

Checkmarx has also expanded its AI-assisted remediation and API security capabilities to align with modern DevSecOps workflows.

By combining these capabilities into a unified platform, Checkmarx offers an enterprise-grade alternative similar in scope to Veracode.

Checkmarx pricing

Checkmarx’s pricing is not available on their website. Scheduling a demo and getting in touch with the team is the only way to understand the cost.

Checkmarx reviews

Checkmarx has a rating of 4.2/5 on G2. Here are some of the Checkmarx reviews from customers:

Veracode vs Checkmarx

• Scanning capabilities: Both Checkmarx and Veracode are capable of performing SAST, DAST and SCA scans.

• Integrations: Checkmarx integrates with a wide range of development tools and environments, including DevOps tools like Jenkins and Azure DevOps, making it easy to integrate into existing workflows. Veracode also integrates with a variety of development tools and platforms.

• Reporting and management: Both Checkmarx and Veracode provide robust reporting and management capabilities, allowing organizations to track the progress of their security testing efforts and easily manage the results.

• Pricing: The cost of both Checkmarx and Veracode can vary depending on the size of the organization, the number of applications being tested, and the level of support required. Veracode has a reputation for being more expensive compared to Checkmarx.

TL;DR Veracode vs Checkmarx

• Scanning capabilities: Both perform SAST, DAST, and SCA scans.

• Integrations: Both integrate with a wide range of development tools and environments.

• Reporting and management: Both provide robust reporting and management capabilities.

• Pricing: Cost varies for both, depending on organization size, applications, and support. Veracode is generally more expensive.

So, which Veracode alternative should you go for?

The right choice depends on your organization’s specific requirements.

If you require a comprehensive enterprise AppSec platform with consolidated testing capabilities, both Veracode and Checkmarx are viable options.

If pricing transparency, developer-centric workflows, or modular flexibility are priorities, alternatives such as Snyk, Beagle Security, or Mend may offer advantages depending on your focus area.

Ultimately, your decision should align with your development velocity, risk tolerance, compliance obligations, and long-term AppSec strategy.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the main difference between SAST and DAST?

A1: SAST (Static Application Security Testing) analyzes code without running the application, finding vulnerabilities in the source code. DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) analyzes the running application from the outside, simulating attacks to find vulnerabilities that appear during execution.

Q2: Is open-source software like OWASP ZAP secure enough for enterprise use?

A2: OWASP ZAP is a robust and widely used tool. While it’s free and open-source, its effectiveness in an enterprise setting often depends on the expertise of the security team managing and configuring it. Many enterprises use it successfully, often alongside commercial tools.

Q3: How important is SCA for modern development?

A3: SCA (Software Composition Analysis) is extremely important. Modern applications heavily rely on open-source components, which can introduce significant vulnerabilities if not properly managed. SCA tools help identify and mitigate these risks, ensuring supply chain security.

Q4: Can I use multiple AppSec tools together?

A4: Yes, a multi-faceted approach, often called “Defense in Depth,” is common. Many organizations use a combination of SAST, DAST, and SCA tools to provide comprehensive coverage across different stages of the SDLC.

Written by

Nandagopal S

Marketing Associate

Contributor

Abey Koshy Itty

Marketing Manager