Content Security Policy (CSP) header not implemented

By
Febna V M
Published on
01 Nov 2024
6 min read
Vulnerability

Content Security Policy (CSP) serves as an additional security layer to identify and mitigate various attacks, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and data injection threats.

To enact CSP, a Content-Security-Policy header should be added to the web application’s responses.

The value of this header comprises a string outlining policy directive that defines the allowed origins for different types of resources used by the site.

Example

If a website requires loading scripts, stylesheets, and images locally, along with scripts from the jQuery library hosted on their Content Delivery Network (CDN), the CSP header might resemble the following:

Content-Security-Policy: 
    default-src 'self'; 
    script-src 'self' https://code.jquery.com;

One of the primary computer security standards is CSP (Content Security Policy). This header was introduced to prevent attacks like cross-site scripting (XSS), clickjacking and other code injection attacks.

These attacks usually result in the execution of malicious content in the trusted web page context. This issue leads to vulnerabilities like Cross-site Scripting and related attacks.

Not implementing the Content Security Policy in the application misses out on the extra layer of security. CSP can be used to restrict script loading to a single domain. There are some keywords for setting CSP directives: -

  • none: Denies loading resources from anywhere.

  • self: Used to point to document’s URL.

  • unsafe-inline: This tag permits running inline scripts

  • unsafe-eval: Permits eval () function

What are the impacts of CSP header not implemented?

The absence of a Content Security Policy (CSP) header in a web application can have several security implications, leaving the site more vulnerable to various types of attacks.

Here are the impacts of not implementing a CSP header:

1. Increased risk of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks

Without CSP, the risk of XSS attacks is elevated. Attackers may inject and execute malicious scripts in the context of the user’s browser, leading to the theft of sensitive information or unauthorized actions.

2. Data injection vulnerabilities

Lack of CSP increases the likelihood of data injection attacks, where attackers manipulate or inject malicious content into a website, potentially compromising user data or altering the site’s behavior.

3. Higher exposure to clickjacking

Clickjacking attacks, where a malicious site overlays a legitimate site to trick users into clicking on unintended actions, become more viable in the absence of CSP.

4. Increased surface for code injection

The absence of CSP allows for a broader surface area for code injection attacks, making it easier for attackers to execute arbitrary code within the application.

5. Limited protection against mixed content

CSP helps mitigate risks associated with mixed content (loading both HTTP and HTTPS resources). Without CSP, the site is more susceptible to potential security issues arising from mixed content.

6. Reduced ability to control resource loading

CSP provides control over which external resources can be loaded on a page. Without it, there’s reduced ability to restrict the sources of scripts, stylesheets, images, and other resources, making the site more susceptible to malicious content.

7. Difficulty in blocking unauthorized origins

CSP allows specifying allowed origins for various resource types. The lack of CSP makes it challenging to block content from unauthorized or untrusted sources, potentially exposing the site to security risks.

8. Weaker defense against code injection

CSP acts as a defense against code injection attacks by enforcing a policy on allowed script sources. Without CSP, the application is more vulnerable to injection attempts that can lead to the execution of malicious code.

9. Limited protection from browser exploits

CSP provides a layer of protection against certain browser exploits. Without it, the site is less resilient to potential vulnerabilities and exploits that attackers could leverage.

In short, the absence of a Content Security Policy (CSP) header exposes a web application to a range of security risks, making it more susceptible to XSS attacks, data injection, clickjacking, and other malicious activities.

Implementing CSP is crucial for enhancing the overall security posture of a web application.

How can you prevent the absence of CSP header?

To prevent the absence of a Content Security Policy (CSP) header in a web application and enhance its security, follow these steps:

1. Implementing CSP header

Add a Content-Security-Policy header to your web application’s responses. Define policy directives that specify the allowed sources for various types of content, such as scripts, stylesheets, images, fonts, and more.

2. Regularly review and update policies

Periodically review and update your CSP policies to accommodate changes in your web application. Ensure that the policies remain effective in protecting against emerging threats.

3. Utilize the ‘report-uri’ directive

Include the ‘report-uri’ directive in your CSP header to receive reports about policy violations. This helps in identifying and addressing potential issues while fine-tuning your policies.

4. Leverage ‘nonce’ and ‘hash’ for dynamic content

If your application generates scripts dynamically, use ‘nonce’ or ‘hash’ values to allow only trusted scripts to execute.

5. Handle inline scripts and styles

Minimize the use of inline scripts and styles. If necessary, use the ‘nonce’ or ‘hash’ values to control their execution.

6. Use ‘strict-dynamic’ for dynamic script loading

If your application dynamically loads scripts, consider using the ‘strict-dynamic’ value for the ‘script-src’ directive. This allows scripts from trusted sources even if they are loaded dynamically.

7. Regular security audits

Conduct regular security audits of your web application’s codebase to identify and address potential security vulnerabilities. Automated tools and manual reviews can help in this regard.

8. Educate development team

Educate your development team about the importance of CSP and best practices for its implementation. Ensure that team members are aware of the potential security risks associated with the absence of CSP.

9. Stay informed about CSP best practices

Stay informed about evolving best practices for CSP. Follow updates from security communities and standards organizations to align your CSP implementation with the latest recommendations.

By following these steps, you can effectively prevent the absence of a Content Security Policy (CSP) header and enhance the security of your web application against various types of attacks.

Automated human-like penetration testing for your web apps & APIs
Teams using Beagle Security are set up in minutes, embrace release-based CI/CD security testing and save up to 65% with timely remediation of vulnerabilities. Sign up for a free account to see what it can do for you.

Written by
Febna V M
Febna V M
Cyber Security Engineer
Experience the Beagle Security platform
Unlock one full penetration test and all Advanced plan features free for 10 days
Find surface-level website security issues in under a minute
Free website security assessment
Experience the power of automated penetration testing & contextual reporting.